Blow Back
 
Home | Reviews | Information
 
 

MUST READING:  Thom Hartmann, "How the Republican Party Has Conned America for Thirty Years,"  Click Here

OUR LONG NATIONAL NIGHTMARE IS NOW OVER:  WELCOME TO THE POST-BUSH WORLD.  NOW THE VERDICT IS UP TO HISTORIANS!

 

 

 

This columnist has been one of the best columnists during the entire 8 years of the Bush mess:  See William Rivers Pitt's "The Greatest Greatness of George W Bush"  here:  http://www.truthout.org/010709J

FAIR NOTICE:  BUSH APOLOGISTS SHOULD AVOID THIS PAGE, IT'S A REAL HORROR!

 

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Why-did-we-all-hate-Palin-by-winston-081206-925.html

This new piece (click on the link above) about Sarah Palin & the GOP is well worth reading.

 

 

Address by Mayor Ross C. "Rocky" Anderson on October 27, 2007
    By David Swanson
    AfterDowningStreet.org
 
    Monday 29 October 2007
 
    Salt Lake City, Utah -
 
    Today, as we come together once again in this great city, we raise
    our voices in unison to say to President Bush, to Vice President
    Cheney, to other members of the Bush Administration (past and
    present), to a majority of Congress, including Utah's entire
    congressional delegation, and to much of the mainstream media: "You
    have failed us miserably and we won't take it any more."
 
    "While we had every reason to expect far more of you, you have been
    pompous, greedy, cruel, and incompetent as you have led this great
    nation to a moral, military, and national security abyss."
 
    "You have breached trust with the American people in the most
    egregious ways. You have utterly failed in the performance of your
    jobs. You have undermined our Constitution, permitted the violation
    of the most fundamental treaty obligations, and betrayed the rule of
    law."
 
    "You have engaged in, or permitted, heinous human rights abuses of
    the sort never before countenanced in our nation's history as a
    matter of official policy. You have sent American men and women to
    kill and be killed on the basis of lies, on the basis of shifting
    justifications, without competent leadership, and without even a
    coherent plan for this monumental blunder."
 
    "We are here to tell you: We won't take it any more!"
 
    "You have acted in direct contravention of values that we, as
    Americans who love our country, hold dear. You have deceived us in
    the most cynical, outrageous ways. You have undermined, or allowed
    the undermining of, our constitutional system of checks and balances
    among the three presumed co-equal branches of government. You have
    helped lead our nation to the brink of fascism, of a dictatorship
    contemptuous of our nation's treaty obligations, federal statutory
    law, our Constitution, and the rule of law."
 
    "Because of you, and because of your jingoistic false 'patriotism,'
    our world is far more dangerous, our nation is far more despised,
    and the threat of terrorism is far greater than ever before.
 
    It has been absolutely astounding how you have committed the most
    horrendous acts, causing such needless tragedy in the lives of
    millions of people, yet you wear your so-called religion on your
    sleeves, asserting your God-is-on-my-side nonsense - when what you
    have done flies in the face of any religious or humanitarian
    tradition. Your hypocrisy is mind-boggling - and disgraceful. What
    part of "Thou shalt not kill" do you not understand? What part of
    the "Golden rule" do you not understand? What part of "be honest,"
    "be responsible," and "be accountable" don't you understand? What
    part of "Blessed are the peacekeepers" do you not understand?
 
    Because of you, hundreds of thousands of people have been killed,
    many thousands of people have suffered horrendous lifetime injuries,
    and millions have been run off from their homes. For the sake of our
    nation, for the sake of our children, and for the sake of our
    brothers and sisters around the world, we are morally compelled to
    say, as loudly as we can, 'We won't take it any more!' "
 
    "As United States agents kidnap, disappear, and torture human beings
    around the world, you justify, you deceive, and you cover up. We
    find what you have done to men, women and children, and to the good
    name and reputation of the United States, so appalling, so
    unconscionable, and so outrageous as to compel us to call upon you
    to step aside and allow other men and women who are competent, true
    to our nation's values, and with high moral principles to stand in
    your places - for the good of our nation, for the good of our
    children, and for the good of our world."
 
    In the case of the President and Vice President, this means
    impeachment and removal from office, without any further delay from
    a complacent, complicit Congress, the Democratic majority of which
    cares more about political gain in 2008 than it does about the
    vindication of our Constitution, the rule of law, and democratic
    accountability.
 
    It means the election of people as President and Vice President who,
    unlike most of the presidential candidates from both major parties,
    have not aided and abetted in the perpetration of the illegal,
    tragic, devastating invasion and occupation of Iraq. And it means
    the election of people as President and Vice President who will
    commit to return our nation to the moral and strategic imperative of
    refraining from torturing human beings.
 
    In the case of the majority of Congress, it means electing people
    who are diligent enough to learn the facts, including reading
    available National Intelligence Estimates, before voting to go to
    war. It means electing to Congress men and women who will jealously
    guard Congress's sole prerogative to declare war. It means electing
    to Congress men and women who will not submit like vapid lap dogs to
    presidential requests for blank checks to engage in so-called
    preemptive wars, for legislation permitting warrantless wiretapping
    of communications involving US citizens, and for dangerous,
    irresponsible, saber-rattling legislation like the recent
    Kyl-Lieberman amendment.
 
    We must avoid the trap of focusing the blame solely upon President
    Bush and Vice-President Cheney. This is not just about a few people
    who have wronged our country - and the world. They were enabled by
    members of both parties in Congress, they were enabled by the
    pathetic mainstream news media, and, ultimately, they have been
    enabled by the American people - 40% of whom are so ill-informed
    they still think Iraq was behind the 9/11 attacks - a people who
    know and care more about baseball statistics and which drunken
    starlets are wearing underwear than they know and care about the
    atrocities being committed every single day in our name by a
    government for which we need to take responsibility.
 
    As loyal Americans, without regard to political partisanship - as
    veterans, as teachers, as religious leaders, as working men and
    women, as students, as professionals, as businesspeople, as public
    servants, as retirees, as people of all ages, races, ethnic origins,
    sexual orientations, and faiths - we are here to say to the Bush
    administration, to the majority of Congress, and to the mainstream
    media: "You have violated your solemn responsibilities. You have
    undermined our democracy, spat upon our Constitution, and engaged in
    outrageous, despicable acts. You have brought our nation to a point
    of immorality, inhumanity, and illegality of immense, tragic,
    unprecedented proportions."
 
    "But we will live up to our responsibilities as citizens, as
    brothers and sisters of those who have suffered as a result of the
    imperial bullying of the United States government, and as moral
    actors who must take a stand: And we will, and must, mean it when we
    say 'We won't take it any more.'"
 
    If we want principled, courageous elected officials, we need to be
    principled, courageous, and tenacious ourselves. History has
    demonstrated that our elected officials are not the leaders - the
    leadership has to come from us. If we don't insist, if we don't
    persist, then we are not living up to our responsibilities as
    citizens in a democracy - and our responsibilities as moral human
    beings. If we remain silent, we signal to Congress and the Bush
    administration - and to candidates running for office - and to the
    world - that we support the status quo.
 
    Silence is complicity. Only by standing up for what's right and
    never letting down can we say we are doing our part.
 
    Our government, on the basis of a campaign we now know was entirely
    fraudulent, attacked and militarily occupied a nation that posed no
    danger to the United States. Our government, acting in our name, has
    caused immense, unjustified death and destruction.
 
    It all started five years ago, yet where have we, the American
    people, been? At this point, we are responsible. We get together
    once in a while at demonstrations and complain about Bush and
    Cheney, about Congress, and about the pathetic news media. We point
    fingers and yell a lot. Then most people politely go away until
    another demonstration a few months later.
 
    How many people can honestly say they have spent as much time
    learning about and opposing the outrages of the Bush administration
    as they have spent watching sports or mindless television programs
    during the past five years? Escapist, time-sapping sports and
    insipid entertainment have indeed become the opiate of the masses.
 
    Why is this country so sound asleep? Why do we abide what is
    happening to our nation, to our Constitution, to the cause of peace
    and international law and order? Why are we not doing all in our
    power to put an end to this madness?
 
    We should be in the streets regularly and students should be raising
    hell on our campuses. We should be making it clear in every way
    possible that apologies or convoluted, disingenuous explanations
    just don't cut it when presidential candidates and so many others
    voted to authorize George Bush and his neo-con buddies to send
    American men and women to attack and occupy Iraq.
 
    Let's awaken, and wake up the country by committing here and now to
    do all each of us can to take our nation back. Let them hear us
    across the country, as we ask others to join us: "We won't take it
    any more!"
 
    I implore you: Draw a line. Figure out exactly where your own moral
    breaking point is. How much will you put up with before you say "No
    more" and mean it?
 
    I have drawn my line as a matter of simple personal morality: I
    cannot, and will not, support any candidate who has voted to fund
    the atrocities in Iraq. I cannot, and will not, support any
    candidate who will not commit to remove all US troops, as soon as
    possible, from Iraq. I cannot, and will not, support any candidate
    who has supported legislation that takes us one step closer to
    attacking Iran. I cannot, and will not, support any candidate who
    has not fought to stop the kidnapping, disappearances, and torture
    being carried on in our name.
 
    If we expect our nation's elected officials to take us seriously,
    let us send a powerful message they cannot misunderstand. Let them
    know we really do have our moral breaking point. Let them know we
    have drawn a bright line. Let them know they cannot take our support
    for granted - that, regardless of their party and regardless of
    other political considerations, they will not have our support if
    they cannot provide, and have not provided, principled leadership.
 
    The people of this nation may have been far too quiet for five
    years, but let us pledge that we won't let it go on one more day -
    that we will do all we can to put an end to the illegalities, the
    moral degradation, and the disintegration of our nation's reputation
    in the world.
 
    Let us be unified in drawing the line - in declaring that we do have
    a moral breaking point. Let us insist, together, in supporting our
    troops and in gratitude for the freedoms for which our veterans gave
    so much, that we bring our troops home from Iraq, that we return our
    government to a constitutional democracy, and that we commit to
    honoring the fundamental principles of human rights.
 
    In defense of our country, in defense of our Constitution, in
    defense of our shared values as Americans - and as moral human
    beings - we declare today that we will fight in every way possible
    to stop the insanity, stop the continued military occupation of
    Iraq, and stop the moral depravity reflected by the kidnapping,
    disappearing, and torture of people around the world.
 

                          The New Wall of Shame

Credit MSNBC

 

Premium Image

_____________
 

 

 

-------
 
Ray McGovern, "Poor George Tenet; He Still Doesn't Get It!"  Required reading.   One does need an antedote for the "crap" dispensed by these Busheviks.
 

What They Said (69 comments )

I was planning to mark the fourth anniversary of the start of the war by looking back at some of the more remarkable statements pundits made at the time. But I'm a weekly cartoonist, and this month I just had too many other ideas clamoring for my limited space, so this one stayed on the back burner and never ended up running. So here's a small exclusive for the HuffPo.

fouryearslater1.jpg


In compiling these quotes, I relied heavily on the excellent work of my friends at Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, who have been tracking right-wing and corporate bias in the media since long before it ever occurred to anyone to coin a word as ungainly as "blog." I also want to give a shoutout to Glenn Greenwald, who keeps track of these things with a methodical relentlessness reminiscent of the Terminator, except, you know, the one from the sequels, where he's a good guy. And before he becomes governor of California.

There's one other quote that I just didn't have room for, which I'd like to include here. In his column of April 15, 2003, Cal Thomas wrote:

When the Berlin Wall fell and Eastern Europe escaped from the shackles of communism, I wrote that we must not forget the enablers, apologists and other "fellow travelers" who helped sustain communism's grip on a sizable portion of humanity for much of the 20th century. I suggested that a "cultural war crimes tribunal" be convened, at which people from academia, the media, government and the clergy who were wrong in their assessment of communism would be forced to confront their mistakes. While not wishing to deprive anyone of his or her right to be wrong, it wouldn't hurt for these people to be held accountable.

That advice was not taken - but today we are presented with another opportunity in the form of scores of false media prophets who predicted disaster should the U.S. military confront and seek to oust the murderous regime of Saddam Hussein. The purpose of a cultural war crimes tribunal would be to remind the public of journalism's many mistakes, as well as the errors of certain politicians and retired generals, and allow it to properly judge their words the next time they feel the urge to prophesy...

All of the printed and voiced prophecies should be saved in an archive. When these false prophets again appear, they can be reminded of the error of their previous ways and at least be offered an opportunity to recant and repent.

 

On that last paragraph, at least, Cal and I are in agreement.

 

Cheers Everybody,

Gene

___________________

 

"Fascist America, in 10 Easy Steps," 04/24/07

A Great American Exposes Bush & Cheney for What They Are:  Crooks & Liars

 

 Lee Iacocca blasts Bush & Cheney as "clueless bozos"
by John Aravosis (DC) · 4/21/2007 12:33:00 PM ET
Discuss this post here: Comment s (221) · digg it · reddit · FARK · · Link


 
 

An excerpt from Iacocca's new book - read the entire excerpt:

Am I the only guy in this country who's fed up with what's happening? Where the hell is our outrage? We should be screaming bloody murder. We've got a gang of clueless bozos steering our ship of state right over a cliff, we've got corporate gangsters stealing us blind, and we can't even clean up after a hurricane much less build a hybrid car. But instead of getting mad, everyone sits around and nods their heads when the politicians say, "Stay the course."

Stay the course? You've got to be kidding. This is America, not the damned Titanic. I'll give you a sound bite: Throw the bums out!

You might think I'm getting senile, that I've gone off my rocker, and maybe I have. But someone has to speak up. I hardly recognize this country anymore. The President of the United States is given a free pass to ignore the Constitution, tap our phones, and lead us to war on a pack of lies. Congress responds to record deficits by passing a huge tax cut for the wealthy (thanks, but I don't need it). The most famous business leaders are not the innovators but the guys in handcuffs. While we're fiddling in Iraq, the Middle East is burning and nobody seems to know what to do. And the press is waving pom-poms instead of asking hard questions. That's not the promise of America my parents and yours traveled across the ocean for. I've had enough. How about you?

I'll go a step further. You can't call yourself a patriot if you're not outraged. This is a fight I'm ready and willing to have....

Why are we in this mess? How did we end up with this crowd in Washington? Well, we voted for them—or at least some of us did. But I'll tell you what we didn't do. We didn't agree to suspend the Constitution. We didn't agree to stop asking questions or demanding answers. Some of us are sick and tired of people who call free speech treason. Where I come from that's a dictatorship, not a democracy....

On September 11, 2001, we needed a strong leader more than any other time in our history. We needed a steady hand to guide us out of the ashes. Where was George Bush? He was reading a story about a pet goat to kids in Florida when he heard about the attacks. He kept sitting there for twenty minutes with a baffled look on his face. It's all on tape. You can see it for yourself. Then, instead of taking the quickest route back to Washington and immediately going on the air to reassure the panicked people of this country, he decided it wasn't safe to return to the White House. He basically went into hiding for the day—and he told Vice President Dick Cheney to stay put in his bunker. We were all frozen in front of our TVs, scared out of our wits, waiting for our leaders to tell us that we were going to be okay, and there was nobody home. It took Bush a couple of days to get his bearings and devise the right photo op at Ground Zero.

That was George Bush's moment of truth, and he was paralyzed. And what did he do when he'd regained his composure? He led us down the road to Iraq—a road his own father had considered disastrous when he was President. But Bush didn't listen to Daddy. He listened to a higher father. He prides himself on being faith based, not reality based. If that doesn't scare the crap out of you, I don't know what will....

I have news for the gang in Congress. We didn't elect you to sit on your asses and do nothing and remain silent while our democracy is being hijacked and our greatness is being replaced with mediocrity. What is everybody so afraid of? That some bobblehead on Fox News will call them a name? Give me a break. Why don't you guys show some spine for a change?

Had Enough?

Hey, I'm not trying to be the voice of gloom and doom here. I'm trying to light a fire. I'm speaking out because I have hope. I believe in America. In my lifetime I've had the privilege of living through some of America's greatest moments. I've also experienced some of our worst crises—the Great Depression, World War II, the Korean War, the Kennedy assassination, the Vietnam War, the 1970s oil crisis, and the struggles of recent years culminating with 9/11. If I've learned one thing, it's this: You don't get anywhere by standing on the sidelines waiting for somebody else to take action. Whether it's building a better car or building a better future for our children, we all have a role to play. That's the challenge I'm raising in this book. It's a call to action for people who, like me, believe in America. It's not too late, but it's getting pretty close. So let's shake off the horseshit and go to work. Let's tell 'em all we've had enough.

January 31, 2007.  Job well done Molly.  We'll miss your columns!

Gene's latest political statement:  July 28, 2006.   Seen around Pullman (WA.) & Moscow (ID.) See picture above.

"Bush in the Bunker," Jan. 2007

Keith Olbermann Gives Dubya a Needed History Lesson 11/22/06

 

Has Keith Olbermann now eclipsed Edward R. Murrow? 11/30/06

 

Keith Olbermann's powerful commentary, "Bush Owes Troops an Apology, not Kerry," 11/01/06

The Bushes and Iran, 09/21/06  MUST READING

 

WILL THE REAL FASCISTS STAND UP? 08/11/2006

 

Frank Rich: Rumsfeld's Dance with the Nazis 09/03/06

 

Bumper Sticker of the Month:  "I Love (use a heart) Dixie Chicks!"

 

Bumper Sticker of the Month:  "Someone give him a blow job so we can impeach him!"

 

"It's hard work!"

 

Courtesy CROOKS AND LIARS

 

According to Benito Mussolini [he should know], "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power."  Where does that put the United States?

THE BIGGEST SCOOP OF THE YEAR: CLICK HERE  @

CROOKS AND LIARS

 

 

 

Credit Wizard of Whimsey (Pay them a visit)

 

 

 

 

Courtesy cartoonist Gary Huck via Americablog

 

Horsey's Cartoon, Seattle PI, April 3, 2005

From the San Francisco Chronicle

"The don't make Jews like Jesus anymore!"  Kinky Friedman(Sunday Morning, 02/20/05)

On Crossfire, 01/24/05, Congresswoman E. H. Norton sized up G.W. Bush's inaugural address perfectly:  "It was nothing more than an attempt at ex post facto rationalization of his unnecessary and illegal preemptive war in Iraq!"   That was also this blogger's exact reaction to the clever but diabolical address. 
 

"A little patience, and we shall see the reign of witches pass over, their spells dissolve, and the people, recovering their true sight, restore their government to its true principles. It is true that in the meantime we are suffering deeply in spirit, and incurring the horrors of a war and long oppressions of enormous public debt...If the game runs sometime against us at home we must have patience till luck turns, and then we shall have an opportunity of winning back the principles we have lost, for this is a game where principles are at stake."

—Thomas Jefferson, 1798 (TomPaine.com)

I wonder which is the more serious offense:  Lying to cover up an illicit affair involving oral sex or lying about one's intentions & evidence in order to launch a preemptive war leading to the death and maiming of hundreds of thousands of men, women, and children, & creating in the process incipient national bankruptcy?

 

I saw an interesting bumper sticker today (Jan. 12, 05):  Don't Blame Me I Voted for Kerry!

____________________________________________________

                                Campaign 2004's most memorable line:

"Our enemies never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and neither do we." G.W. Bush, 8 Aug. 2004

_____________________________________________________

Bush may (discounting flagrant cases of fraud) have received more votes than any president in history but it's also true, as Howard Dean noted, "More Americans voted against George W. Bush than any president in American history." 

              

Jesusland should be called Millerland, after Zell & Dennis.  Or maybe Falwellcountry or Bob Jones Country.  I rather think Jesus would deal with these folks about like he dealt with the money changers!

 

It's a Purple America not Red:  For a more accurate map regarding Democratic & Republican victories google a study conducted by Princeton University scholars: http://www.edu/~rudb/JAVA/election2004/

"There was no exit strategy [for Iraq] because the strategists of the Bush administration never planned on leaving."  Tom Engelhardt, 11 June 2004.  Read TomDispatch.com

 

Who wants to be the last person to die in Bush's unnecessary war?  Step right up please.

The recently discovered memos regarding Dubya's Guard service appear to be genuine and, if they are,  one can only conclude that George W. Bush is a liar and a coward.  When will he be held to account?   (posted 09/13/04)  Added 01/11/05: Interesting to note that the so-called independent panel, headed by Thornburgh & Boccardi, didn't even attempt (so they claimed) to determine whether the memos were authentic--the basic question at issue in the brouhaha!

 

 

Reuters
Tuesday, March 16, 2004; 10:34 PM

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush and four top advisors made a combined 237 misleading public statements on the threat posed by Iraq, Democrats charged in a congressional report released on Tuesday.  Serial liars:  see link below

Link:  PNAC, Is This the American Version of Mein Kampf?

Important note regarding anti-Semitism

The real reasons for the invasion of Iraq

My favorite economist writing about the "Maestro of Chutzpah"

Interview with one of my favorite historians since the 1960s

What happens when a fool whacks the hornet's nest?

Senator Edward M. Kennedy's March 5, 2004, speech on Iraq

Is there a cure for the Vietnam syndrome that has such a hold on our Chicken Hawks?

The Neocon Theft of Social Security funds.

How the Bush cartel misled the U.S. into war.

Karen Kwiatkowski's bi-weekly columns: MUST READ

Top 40 Bush lies in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq (7/31/2003)

House Study Summing Up Bush Administration's Dissembling Iraq Record

The Truth About the American Tax System (Part I)

Part II of the lowdown on the tax system

Neo-con Medicare flimflam

"George Bush & the Rise of Christian Fascism?

Why didn't General Powell do the honorable thing?

Religion & Politics:  Must Read

Handover a Fraud

Senator Byrd to President-select Bush

Hypothetical Memo from Nemesis Number One

Bush's world:  Welcome to 1984

The Case for G.W. Bush's Impeachment

Democratic Response to President Bush's Weekly

Reality & the Claim to Moral Superiority

"Drowned in the wasteful ravages of cruel wars," once again.

Bush's war increasingly being seen as a strategic blunder. (Go to this website)

America's Blue Dress:  Thanks to Dubya

The War that Should Never have been Fought, is Lost

"More Troops?  A March of Folly (Required Reading!)

This is how a nation acts that hasn't abandoned isolationism either intellectually or emotionally, just as Henry S. Commager predicted 30 years ago.

Who set the stage for the debauchery?

"Stupidity in Power"

Iraq Exit Strategy

How dare Nancy Pelosi to call G.W.B. incompetent!

Armageddon time:  Bush's Religious War

Heil Hannity's Least Favorite Speech

Religious fundamentalism & Mid-East Policy

Greater Threat than Terrorists

Why GWB Accepts no Blame

Remarks by Senator Hollings:  Must Read

Restarting the Cold War & Calling It a War Against Terror

The Authoritarian Personality & the Reactionary Conservative Quest for Heroes

Prize Winning R.W.R. Obituary!  Must Read (I'll call it the Clanton prize a la the Pulitzer)

Juan Cole's Reagan Obituary ("Reagan Passing," 6 June 04)

Is This the Beginning of the End of the Bush Cabal? Red Hot

Chalmers Johnson on Why Kerry Should Be Your Choice

Revealing interview with David Brock

Clinton-haters vs. Bush-bashers

"Crazy Like a Statesman": Brilliant Editorial

Does the Bush Cabal Imperil Democracy?

"Liberalism and the Left," by Eric Foner

"Classics of Liberalism," Rob Kall's Blog & More

Thank You Michael Moore, W. R. Pitt

"Who Lost Iraq?"

Public has been misled regarding Bush War casualties

Laurie Mylroie & Dubya's War Against Saddam

Visit the Washington Spectator to read "The Reagan Not Remembered," 7/1/04

Get a Rope:  This Smells to High Heaven!`

The Bush/Cheney/Feith subterfuge meriting jail time.

GOP-Controlled Senate Intelligence Com. Whitewash

Uruguay editor defends comparison of Bush & Hitler (pstd  07/14/04)

Neo-Conservative Draft Riots: Humor (pstd 07/16/04)

"This is the Fight of Our Lives," pstd 07/18/04

A Little Help from Your Friends, pstd 7/19/04

Scapegoating the Intelligence Community, pstd 07/22/04

"Bad News for Bush," the 9/11 Report, pstd 07/23/04

Richard A. Clarke on the 9/11 Report, pstd 07/25/04

Clintons' teriffic speech, pstd 07/26/04

Kennedy's DNC speech (less spectacular than Bill's but more substantive) pstd 07/28/04

Michael Moore's talk in Cambridge, Mass, pstd 07/29/04

Barack Obama's Speech, pstd 07/30/04

John Kerry's Acceptance Speech, pstd 07/30/04

Who wants to be the last person to die in Bush's unnecessary war? pstd 08/01/04 (Not working:  go to Richard Cohen's column)

9/11 Report "seriously flawed," Sibel Edmonds to Thomas Kean,pstd,08/03/04

Intelligence Failure Lies with the President, pstd 08/03/04

Is the Commander-in-Chief a Deserter? pstd 08/05/04

"Let's Not Devalue Ourselves," pstd 08/05/04

"Ditch the Distraction in Chief," pstd 08/05/04

"Does anyone really favor an administration that so shamelessly lies?" asks Ronald P. Reagan, pstd 08/07/04 (His dad, the pre-Goldwater rendition for sure, would be proud of Jr.)

Pass this one on. (Dubya caught telling the truth),  pstd 08/07/04

We know where John was but WHERE WAS GEORGE? pstd 08/08/04

"Rolling the dice in Najaf," pstd 08/11/04

Total war, by accident or design? pstd 08/15/04

Republican Smear Campaign, pstd 08/19/04

Jonathan Schell on Empire:  Required reading, pstd 08/20/04

John Kerry's Truly Extraordinary & Heroic 1971 Senate Testimony, pstd 08/22/04

The Charges are False, LA Times, pstd 08/24/04

What were President Bush & Vice President Cheney doing in 1969? pstd 08/24/04

Top Notch LA Times Editorial, Must Read, pstd 08/24/04

Swift Boat Commander reveals the true story.  pstd 08/25/04

William Rood's first-person account," pstd 08/25/04

No matter how you slice it, "Bush is Incompetent," pstd 08/28/04

Were there significant atrocities in the Vietnam War? pstd 09/01/04

Why Dick Cheney Deserves an F in History, pstd 09/01/04

Elsewhere on this site I insulted Forest Gump: This is my apology. pstd 09/01/04

"Feel the Hate," Krugman. pstd 09/03/04

Molly, pstd 09/03/04

"Cheney Spits Toads," pstd 09/09/04

Gold Brick Number One, pstd 09/09/04

Bush's Terror War a Failure, pstd 09/09/04

There is more to be learned about GWB's shady military past, pstd 09/10/04

"It's the Dishonesty, Stupid." pstd 09/10/04

Ode to the Bush Cabal, pstd 09/12/04

Let's Face It Folks, G. W. Bush did not earn his honorable discharge. pstd 09/13/04

It's Bare-Knuckle Time, pstd 09/13/04

"Girlie Man:  George W. Bush is a Coward," pstd 09/15/04

Will Rightwing Nuts Lynch Dan Rather? pstd 09/17/04

More on the Memos, pstd  09/17/04

What a mess GWB's war has become. pstd 09/18/04

Maureen Dowd & the Security Moms. pstd 09/18/04

"When Fascism Comes to America, It Will Be Embraced by Fox News." pstd 09/21/04

A Coward and a Liar, No Doubt About It! pstd 09/24/04

Bush's War in Iraq,:  An "Exercise in Colossal Stupidity." pstd 09/26/04

It Ain't Funny! pstd 09/28/04

Senator Kennedy's Speech Regarding the Mess Created by GWB pstd 09/28/04

Graydon Carter interview on G.W.B. pstd 09/29/04

Why GWB Shouldn't Be Elected pstd 09/30/04

Bush's war was unnecessary,  pstd 09/30/04

The Endorsement of GWB's Hometown Paper. pstd 10/02/04

"At last, sir, have you no sense of decency?" pstd 10/03/04

"What would Jesus do?" pstd 10/08/04

What did we die for? pstd 10/08/04

"The scary little man!" pstd 10/09/04

"When Presidents Lie," MUST READ, outstanding work, pstd 10/10/04

"There will be a reckoning." pstd 10/11/04

The Last Word on the "Debates." pstd 10/15/04

"Lynn Cheney & the Lavender Smokescreen," pstd 10/15/04

"Liberal Christians mobilize to oppose the Christian Right." pstd 10/16/04

Must Read:  NY Times endorsement of Kerry.  pstd l0/16/04

Al Gore Speech Regarding Bush's War of Choice. pstd 10/19/04

Howard Zinn on Dubya's phony record of success in his Unnecessary War. pstd 10/19/04

"Wake Up and Smell the Fascism." pstd 10/20/04

The Last Word on  the Mary Cheney Farce. pstd 10/22/04

My Sentiments Exactly. pstd 10/24/04

"Karl Rove: America's Mullah."  pstd 10/24/04

GEORGE DUBYA BUSH:  PHONY FIGHTER PILOT, pstd 10/25/04

"White House of Horrors." pstd 10/28/04

"It's the Incompetence, Stupid." pstd 11/01/04

Ignoring the Human Cost of GWB's War. pstd 11/03/04

American Jihadist: Texas Style. pstd 11/04/04

You Might be a Closet Bushie if... pstd 11/05/04

"No Surrender," Krugman, pstd 11/05/04

A Thoughtful Message from TomDispatch. pstd 11/07/04

Dennis Kucinich on the Ohio vote, pstd 11/10/04

Bob Jones' Letter Congratulating GWB, pstd 11/10/04

"A Moveable Feast of Terrorism," pstd 11/11/04

All Ohio votes will be counted, so they say pstd 11/11/04

A letter we should all read, pstd 11/12/04

Why the slaughter in Fallujah? pstd 11/13/04F

"Fascism Anyone," REQUIRED READING pstd 11/14/04

"I Smell a Rat," fraud, pstd 11/15/04

Hunter Thompson: "Four more years of George Bush will be like four more years of syphilis." pstd, 11/16/04

"The Neocon Coup," pstd 11/18/04

PNAC Neocons Conquer All, pstd 11/18/04

Proof of Republican Fraud in Florida, pstd 11/19/04

"Absolute Power Erupts," pstd 11/21/04

"Destroying Iraq to Save It," pstd 11/22/04

Dahr Jamail, Interview, pstd 12/02/2004

Bob Novak, un-indicted traitor, finally gets his due. pstd 12/06/04

Bush cabal plotting & planning for the destruction of Social Security, pstd 12/07/04

Helen Thomas' Latest Common Sense Editorial, pstd 12/07/04

"Why I'm Quitting the Democrats," pstd 12/11/04

"After the last tree is felled, Christ will come back." pstd 12/11/04

Looting Social Security, pstd 12/18/04

Award this Military Mother the Medal of Freedom! pstd 12/22/04

"Richard Vigurie, the Neo-Cons and the Destruction of America," pstd 12/22/04

"A limited modified hangout." pstd 12/24/04

9/11 G.W. Bush's Biggest Failure. pstd 12/25/04

How to avoid a theocratic rightwing state. 12/26/04

The Religious Right Scares this fundamentalist. pstd 12/26/04

Why the Iraqi Insurgents are Willing to Die to Defeat the U.S." pstd 1/05/05

Bushies Hire Their Own Pundit/Hacks. pstd 1/11/05

Investigation of the CBS Guard Program a Huge Coverup.  The Media has not yet written this story.  One hopes that Rather spends much of his new retirement time authenticating the Killian documents!  1/11/05

Here it is. 1/11/05

The Bush Administration's Religious Fundamentalism 1/13/05

Senator Kennedy's Blueprint for the Democratic Party 1/13/05

Bush administration manufactures its own pundits & news  1/13/05

"Corporate Americans," pstd 01/18/05

Mark Twain's War Prayer, pstd 01/18/05

Social Security, Destruction, not improvement, is Their Professed Goal, pstd 01/19/05

Maureen Dowd hits another homerun! pstd 01/20/05

"None so Blind,"  another homerun, probably Katrina, pstd 01/22/05

Another Homerun for Maureen: "Love for Sale," 01/27/05

Hersh Blockbuster: "We've Been Taken Over by a Cult," 01/27/05

Torture Czar:  "Speedy Gonzales & the Rule of Law," 01/27/0

Can Folks Who Neither Understand Nor Support Democracy at Home Really Be in Favor of Democracy for Iraq? 01/28/095

GOP Prostitution? See "Love for Sale," 01/28/05

A Republican Thinking Heretical Thoughts, 01/29/05

Must Read:  "What Are We Fighting For?" Wise Words Indeed by Naomi Klein,  01/30/05

Senator Robert Byrd Regarding Alberto Gonzales, 02/02/05

A Progressive Alternative to the Policies of the Busheviks  02/02/05

Krugman removes the Bull from the Bushevik campaign to Create Social Insecurity, 02/04/05

NY TIMES Intimidated by Busheviks 02/04/05.  Byproduct of the furious attack against CBS & Dan Rather?

Paranoia Significantly on the Rise? 02/06/05

Busheviks Favor a Social Insecurity System 02/06/05

Bush's Social Insecurity Plan 02/08/05

Deforming Social Security:  Busheviks Endanger America's Future 02/09/05

"Ann Coulter Sticks Her Entire Leg in Her Mouth," 02/09/05 (Trouble with this one:  try www.whatreallyhappened.com)

"The law of unintended consequences." 02/09/05

"Draft" the Mainstream Media 02/14/05

Dowd on White House Press Shill.  02/17/05

Frank Rich on the GOP's Fakery!  02/17/05

"Top 10 Conservative Idiots"  02/21/05

What's It All About Alfie?  02/21/05

Christian Right Silent Regarding Gannon Affair 02/24/05

"Kansas on My [Krugman's] Mind.  02/25/05

Encore:  "The Rise of Pseudo Fascism" 02/25/05

One of the Few, Truly Honest Big-Time  Mainstream Journalists!  02/27/05

Where's the Outrage? 02/28/05

Black Ribbons & Stop Bush's Wars 02/28/05

Must Read:  The Crazies Are Up to No Good 03/01/05

Molly & the Swift Liars 03/02/05

Frank Rich & Gannongate  03/03/05

Stopping Bush Storm Troopers  03/03/05

Greenspan Just Another "Starve the Beast," NeoCon  03/04/05

Religion & Politics 03/07/05

"The Immorality of the Bush Budget," 03/09/05

"What Jesus Wouldn't Do," 03/09/05

Part I of Scott Ritter Interview 03/11/05

Why worry about male chauvinists? 03/13/05

America's most insidious ideological threat, 03/14/05

One of Many Dumb Decisions Before Iraq, 03/14/05

Telling the truth about Busheviks, They're "Extreme & Reckless," 03/14/05

Wise words regarding East Asia by the Preeminent Authority, 03/15/05

The GOP Record on Social Security, 03/16/05

Bushianity & Busheviks, 03/16/05

It Isn't Going to Lead to Democracy, Unless you Mean Democracy Bushevik Style,03/16/05

"A Wink and a Fraud," 03/17/05

Historical Appreciation, 03/17/05

Let's Face It, Greenspan is a Political Hack, 03/17/05

Bad Intelligence Was Not at Fault for Bush Blunder, 03/19/05

Democracy Deception, 03/19/05

Plague of Brain-Dead Moralists 03/23/05

"We Really Are a Theocracy" 03/24/05

"Patriotism is NonPartisan," 03/24/05

"The God Racket, From DeMille to DeLay," 03/24/05

The Latest Political Shell Game, 03/25/05

The Ultimate  Hypocrite, Tom DeLay  03/29/05

The Illogic of Anti-Abortion Fanatics, 03/29/05

Exposing the Neo-Con Hustle! 03/30/05

Republican Leader Concedes GOP Commandeered  by the Reactionary "Christian" Right, 03/31/05

The Goofball is in the White House 04/03/05

Has the U.S. Crossed Its Own Rubicon? 04/04/05

Barbara Ehrenreich Interview, 04/11/05

G.W. Bush's Culture of Death 04/12/05

Kansas Senator Pat Roberts Betrays Betrays a Trust 04/14/05"

"The New McCarthyism," 04/24/05

Ugly Chickens Come Home to Roost 04/26/05

Party before Country, first, last, & always in the Bushevik world. 04/28/05

Open Letter to Howard Dean 04/29/05

Vietnam & Iraq, Bushevik Revisionist History 05/01/05

Proof G. W. Bush Manufactured Intelligence 05/04/05

Is the U.S. on the Verge of Bankruptcy? 05/11/05

"They Lied to Us," 05/11/05

"Bill Moyers Strikes Back," 05/l6/05

Molly:  "Don't Blame Newsweek," 05/17/05

Reaganite Calls for Bush's Impeachment, 05/20/05

At Least One Worthwhile Graduation Address, 05/24/05

"Why I'm Joining the GOP," 05/30/05

Bush & the Downing Street Memo, 06/01/05

Worse Than Watergate, 06/03/05

"The War to Deceive America into War--And the War to Cover Up the Deception." 06/06/05

Exit Iraq, 06/06/05

Watergate Ghosts Haunt the White House, 06/07/05

"Stripping Runfeld & Bush of Impunity," 06/07/08

Has There Ever Been a Bigger Liar in the White House? 06/09/2005

"Proof is in the Memo: Soldiers Died for a Lie," 06/13/05

"THE LIE OF THE CENTURY," 06/13/05

MUST READ: "In the American Bunker," 06/14/05

You Can't Say That! 06/19/05

"Mommy, Why Did Daddy Die?" 6/20/05

"I'm a war president," ain't it grand? 06/24/05

"Expensive Favor," 06/25/05

"No Apologies, Senator Durbin," 06/26/05

Hard-Hitting Post Speech Analysis, Blog,  06/28/05

Roots of Rightwing Extremism, 06/30/05

"America Held Hostage," 07/02/05

Daniel Ellsberg on Dubya's Predicament, 07/03/05

Iraq Hawk now sees the error of his ways. 07/03/05

"Harvest of Pain and Sorrow," 07/04/05

Interview with Joseph Wilson, 07/06/05

Could the Source of the Plame Leak by Poppy Bush? 07/13/05

All truth is political; ask Karl Rove, 07/15/05

By Golly, Rich's Got It! 07/16/05

How the U.S. was lied into war by George W. Bush 07/23/05

Why Judith Miller is sitting in jail:  "The Web of Lies Run Deeper," 07/13/05

Does the Plame Leak Begin with C. Rice? 07/27/05

More on the Plame Affair 07/27/05

It's the oil, stupid! 07/28/05

Ten Questions for Cheney 08/06/05

Why Do They Hate Us? 08/07/05

No Lobotomy for Maureen! 08/10/05

"Someone Tell the President the War is Over," 08/14/05

Must read follow-up to Rich's editorial, 08/15/05

Time to Stand Up & Be Counted! 08/20/05

Swift-Boat Liars Direct Their Fire Against a Gold-Star Mother for Truth! 08/21/05

"Why We Must Leave Iraq," 08/25/05

"Democrats Must Call for a Pullout," 08/30/05

What We've Learned Since 9/11, 08/30/05

"An Irate Soldier's Letter Regarding George W. Bush" 09/06/05

The Limits of Empire, Howard Zinn Interview, 09/08/05

Maureen Dowd's Latest: Read It While You Can,  09/14/05

"I Don't Think We're in Kansas Anymore," 09/18/05

Tom Dispatch Interview with Cindy! 09/29/05

The Impending Death of American Democracy! 10/05/05

The Victory Culture 10/10/05

"It's Bush-Cheney, Not Rove/Libby" 10/17/05

The Opportunity to Restore Integrity to a White House Ruled by Thugs. 10/21/05

Why the Dubya Crew Acted so Stupidly Toward Iraq.  10/24/05

Dowd:  "Woman of Mass Destruction" 10/22/05

Dowd: "Dick at the Heart of Darkness," 10/16/05

How We Got Into This Mess, 10/30/05

Scott Ritter's Got It Right Again:  "Indicting America," 10/30/05

"The White House Criminal Conspiracy," 11/04/05

A Pledge All Genuine Patriots Should Take, 11/11/05

"Of Darwinism and Social Darwinism," 11/29/05

"When the president does it, it's legal!", 12/20/05

Victory in Iraq but for Whom? 12/27/05

Bush's War Will Likely Cost the Nation More Than 2 Trillion Dollars 01/07/06

Dowd: "Googling Past the Graveyard," 01/22/06

Molly Ivins:  Ditto, 01/22/06

Walter LaFeber on Rice's Mistaken Foreign Policy, 03/06/06

Down with the "Son-of-Bitches," 03/13/06

Proud to be a Revisionist Historian, 03/13/06

Why was Bush able to mislead Americans? 03/21/06

Waging war against the Constitution? 03/27/06

Bush Armageddon Time, see Seymour Hersh, The New Yorker, 04/17/06

Bush II Supplants RWR As Our Worst President Ever, 04/27/04

Chalmers Johnson on Exporting Democracy, 05/02/06

What the nation has lost! 05/09/06

Alas! a true heroine among America's youth, 05/20/06

"Kingdom Coming," an Interview 06/01/06

Treason, Pure & Simple 06/07/06

Scapegoat the Press, 07/02/06

A Former Republican Who Knows What He's Talking About, 07/22/07


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bonners Ferry, Id. 2003

 


 

Don't we all know the feeling?  Four More Years of This

The British Are Coming, pstd, 08/08/04

 

I don't think George W. Bush is an idiot, but he sure has made a number of idiotic decisions.  As Forest Gump's mother might have said, Idiocy is as idiocy does.  (O.G.C., 08/12/04)

 

Buzzflash.com

Animated Political Cartoon by Mark Fiore, Worth Viewing, Click Here

Visit the PNAC (Project for the New American Century) Cabal, Link to Dubya's Brains Trust!

 

Here's to you 56 million or so that voted the wrong way!

Borrowed from www.phonyfighterpilot.com.  Great site.

Hot political links

Will the Real Fascists Stand Up? 08/11/2006

Why the delay  in the 9/11 investigation?

Open Letter to President G. W. Bush

Everything we need to know regarding Dubya's military record!

Click here just for fun.

Ann Colder cartoon.

"The Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy and How It Grew"

George W. Bush's women

G. W. Bush's personal copy of the infamous Aug. 6 memo.

Greg Palast for the truth.

Try this link:  Caution, Cheneyess language & starkly realistic photos: www.bushbacklash.com/

Click here to access a great site for anti-Bush links

Click here to help Uncle Dick preserve America

Everything you want to know about the religious right in America

 

STOP MAD COWBOY DISEASE!!! (www.seeyageorge.com)

A mosaic of GW fashioned from photos of the troops killed in Iraq.   Source: Truthout.com

The Left Has Never Been So Right! (www.seeyageorge.com)

 

 

     Courtesy THE NATION magazine

 

 

Actually the sign is inaccurate;  President Bush's war against Iraq has virtually bankrupted the country, killed and wounded thousands, and created many more terrorists-- negative accomplishments we could have done without.  In the end we'll most likely have another regime in Iraq similar to the one in Iran. (This was posted midway through 2004.)

We're creating enemies faster than we can kill them! (www.seeyageorge.com)

G.W. Bush caught telling the truth again:  The rich shouldn't be taxed at a high rate because "really rich people figure out how to dodge taxes anyway." pstd 08/10/04

In 1948 Harry Truman popularized the expression "Give 'em Hell, Harry!"   Why not substitute Kerry for Harry in 2004?  Said Truman, "I just tell the truth and they think it's hell!"

 

A really sharp editor:  "What used to be called liberal is now radical; what used to be called radical is now called insane; and what used to be called reactionary is now called moderate or compassionate; and what used to be called insane is now solid conservative thinking."  Katrina van den Heuvel, The Nation.  Amen to that.

If fascism, according to Mussolini, is the "the merger of corporate and government

 

 

 

QUESTION OF THE MOMENT
 
Could George H. W. Bush have been source of the leak regarding Joseph Wilson's wife?  As a former head of the CIA , with connections to Joseph Wilson as director and later as president, he certainly is a possible suspect.  The former president also has a well-know propensity for rushing to the aid of George Bush junior.  Wouldn't that be ironic.  It might even add some special meaning to G.W.B.'s comment that "we might never know who leaked."
 
Perhaps a better question is: Do the American people even give a rat's behind about whether the Bush cabal fatally undermines democratic government in this country?  Now I understand where Michael Moore is coming from when he asks, "Where's My Country, Dude?"
 

A LETTER TO THE EDITOR BY GENE CLANTON

27 November 2003

What follows is a letter that I published in a small Idaho newspaper in January 1988. With only minor adjustments, in spite of the so-called Republican Revolution of the 1990s and the even greater resurgence of today’s neo-conservatism, it remains pertinent. The editor published the piece as a column & entitled it, not inappropriately,  "Reactionaries are Masquerading as Conservatives."*

 

Reactionaries are Masquerading as Conservatives, by Gene Clanton

Someone should waste a little time explaining to our latest plague of neo-and pseudo-conservatives–Reaganites one and all–that genuine liberalism virtually became an extinct species at some point in the 1950s.

Since then, we really have had a one-party system with two conservative wings–one more conservative than the other, one calling itself Republican and the other Democratic; deeply entrenched within the camp of each is a reactionary element, far more strongly represented, as is plain to see, within the anciently transfigured party of Lincoln than in the modern-day successor to Jefferson’s democracy.

Although its roots can be traced back, quite substantially, to the anti-Populist (or if you please, anti-democratic) camp of the late 19th century, this reactionary element truly became a coalition in the 1930s to combat the Democratic Roosevelt’s New Deal, and it has flourished ever since (We can hear echoes distinctly in our day when these reactionary conservatives invariably refer to the Democratic party as the "Democrat" party; it’s a practice commenced, not coincidentally, by Senator Joseph McCarthy.) .

The coalition (we called it the "unholy alliance" in the early 1960s) has fattened primarily on fears, real and imagined, generated by the Cold War and compounded by the backlash created by the Supreme Court’s reinterpretation of the Constitution aimed at breathing life into the Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment, a judicial evolution that began in the 1920s but which attained revolutionary proportions when it came to fruition with the Warren Court (1953-69).

The coalition has likewise fattened on hatred generated by opposition to the civil liberties movements which were at the same time both cause and consequence of the Supreme Court’s long overdue revitalization of this Nation’s great charter of liberties.

This reactionary coalition, when not simply inspired by venality, is a peculiar psychological phenomenon. One study recently explained the persuasion "as a set of neuroses rooted in ‘fear and aggression, dogmatism and the intolerance of ambiguity.’" However that may be, reactionaries are essentially neo-isolationists, kissing cousins of Know-Nothingism, and the product of a mind-set that has "abandoned isolationism intellectually but not emotionally," as was noted in 1946 by Henry Steele Commager, arguably the preeminent historian of the post-World War II era.

This reactionary coalition seeks security with excessive zeal in support of armaments, space shields, and assorted aggressive activities, at home and abroad, aimed at making this diverse and not altogether appreciative nation and world a mirror image of itself.

At the same time, the reactionary coalition simplistically assumes that economic freedom is the fundamental and transcendent liberty, the sine qua non of democracy. Consequently, the coalition opposes the admittedly flawed, middle-course adjustments occasioned by the earlier failures of pristine capitalism–especially those implemented in the aftermath of the monumental and until recently unrivaled 1929 collapse (the stock market crash of 1987 surpassed the earlier debacle.).

In short, this reactionary coalition is best described by configurations of a number of half-baked notions subsumed under the labels anti-welfare state and pro-warfare state. Its religion is unabashed, hysterical anti-communism (by all too easy extension, anti-socialism and anti-liberalism) and its Devil is communism (socialism and liberalism).

Let us not forget that William Buckley and Brent Bozell announced as far back as 1954 in their book written in defense of Joe McCarthy that "Some day, the patience of America may at last be exhausted, and we will strike out against liberals."

This reactionary mind-set spawns a wide variety of extraordinarily paradoxical behavior: foremost, it allows the true believer and the self-serving fellow traveler to embrace and advocate outrageously contradictory beliefs; history, in the most absurd fashion, becomes useful only as it is made to serve those beliefs. (Methinks it is not coincidental that George Bush the elder and George W. Bush each are prone to use the word history as a synonym for done, dead, or irrelevant. The truth is of course that history is never dead, done, or irrelevant, and those who think it is are only doomed to fail to learn its lessons!)

Perhaps the latest and most prominent example of this doublethink is revealed in the pseudo-conservative’s strident advocacy of radical democratic reform in authoritarian socialist countries and, at the same time, the expression of utter contempt or disregard for democracy in this country; likewise in the case of vicious, right-wing regimes around the globe. Their mantra is: "you’re either with us or you’re against us." It is, of course, a characteristic shared by those on the extreme left.

The bottom line is, they may call themselves "freedom fighters" and "conservatives," while spurning the reactionary label, but as one of the early heroes of this coalition said (Joe McCarthy, and if the sales of Ann Coulter’s book Treason is any indication Joe’s still their hero), "If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and looks like a duck, it’s most likely a duck."

To restore clarity and to maintain the integrity of conservatism, clearly a worthy goal, let us recognize these ideologues for what they are–reactionaries not conservatives (Perhaps the current use of "neo-cons" and "neo-fascists" is a significant step in that direction?).

_______

*Although the terms radical, liberal, conservative, and reactionary are decidedly slippery and always subject to delineation as regards time and space dimensions, the author is herein using the terms essentially as did an authority I will reference here with some modifications: Reactionary represents "efforts to stop change and decrease the power of lower-class and minority groups"; conservative represents "attempts to maintain [and empower] the political and class status quo [closely associated with the dominant economic system]"; liberal represents "efforts to promote social changes which do not challenge [in a fundamental way] the existing class and economic system"; and radical represents "efforts to advance political, economic, and social democracy which often, though not always, see the capitalist system as the cause of problems" (See Robert Fisher, Let the People Decide: Neighborhood Organizing in America, xxiii-xxiv). The hallmarks of pre-industrial classical conservatism and liberalism–for conservatives, "maintaining order and protecting property," and for liberals, "individual liberty"–still have resonance but have been greatly conflicted by the 19th century’s economic revolution. In our time reactionaries seem drawn to the classical conservative position in their pronounced tendency to champion the notion that government has one legitimate role–that of maintaining order and safeguarding national security. In other words the policeman’s role of government greatly complicated by the now-advanced state of modern weaponry. Liberalism’s role has been complicated by that development as well but even more so by the emergence of a corporate world that has given us corporate liberalism and liberal corporatism.

_________

 

Guest commentary:  From Barbara's Daily BuzzFlash Minute, 5 Jan. 2004.

"For the life of me, I cannot understand how a bunch of pompous, moralistic blowhards can convince the American public that lying about sex is an offense serious enough to impeach a president, while lying about going to war--where American soldiers and innocent lives are lost--is a mistake blessed by God!  There is something to be said for that old saying, 'Don't suffer fools gladly,' or you may find yourself in hell!"

"'By golly, you deal in this stuff, you're going to jail for a long period of time.' That's a quote from former Congressman Bill McCullum speaking to 60 Minutes on mandatory sentences for illegal drug users.  I'm just wondering if mandatory sentences apply to Radical Right Wing Rich White Men Repuglicans [sic] or just to people who can't afford a lawyer?  It's amazing where the lines are drawn--the Rush Limbaughs of the world are to be pitied and sent to rehab, while Joe Blow's first offense gets him sent to the slammer for years!"

 

"Anyone who hasn't stopped supporting George W. Bush by this time must have a major character flaw."  Janeane Garofalo, Air America, May 2004. (This isn't an exact quote; wise words nonetheless.))

 

The Reactionary Corner:

"In order for me to believe that God was sending America a message, I would need to be shown that the people who died Tuesday [9-ll] were all members of the NOW gang, or abortionists, civil libertarians, et cetera."  Rush Limbaugh

Odds & Ends

According to Buzzflash "Bush is a cross between Forrest Gump, Francisco Franco, and Leonid Brezhnev."

The ad comparing Hitler and Bush entered into MoveOn's contest is indeed flawed:  after all Hitler was a vegetarian and he mangled his words less often.

=====================================================================================

Feb. 15, 2004, Letter to the Lewiston Tribune, by Gene Clanton

Dear Editor:

I would like to congratulate P.M. for having written one of the better editorials to appear anywhere this current political season. I refer to "America keeps fighting the tragic war in Vietnam." He is so right.

Unfortunately, America learned the wrong lesson in the aftermath of America's "longest and wrongest" war (1950-1975). The lesson learned was not that it was a tragic mistake that should never have occurred, rather the lesson learned and taught from on high, especially by President Ronald W. Reagan and his disciples, was that the war was a "noble cause" that was betrayed by "wimpish" leaders and Jane Fonda liberals. This wrong-history-lesson-learned syndrome has been primarily responsible for the rise into power of what I would identify as a "reactionary coalition" made up primarily of ultra-conservative or neo-conservative Republicans and Democrats (especially southern Democrats).


This element took from the Vietnam experience, foremost, the notion that if the nation ever again engaged in war it should throw everything at the enemy, including the kitchen sink. There have been some puny forerunners ( Grenada, Panama, etc.) but Iraq has managed to make itself the primary target and victim of this wrong-lesson-learned twice now in the last twelve years.

Assuming John Kerry becomes the nominee of his party this year we can expect this reactionary coalition, as never before, to work at discrediting and smearing the Massachusetts senator by constantly linking him with the symbolism represented in Jane Fonda's principled stand against a tragic war that cost this country nearly 58,000 dead and 300,000 wounded.  And let us not forget the cost to Vietnam: 2 million dead and probably twice that many injured.

We will have made progress in this country when our neo-conservatives and right-wing nuts can no longer make political hay by scapegoating Jane Fonda.

========================================================================================

 

Another letter, Daily News, Moscow, 21 Feb. 2004.

 

Let’s Outlaw Heterosexual Marriages

Dear Editor:

If I were an illegitimate president who had botched the job as badly as George W. Bush I would be searching frantically for wedge issues with which to divide and conquer my opponents (Pardon me, you say, "we stole the election fair and square and all the bad stuff is Clinton's fault.":).   It seems the Bush cabal believes they’ve found an especially good one: Sponsorship of a constitutional amendment to outlaw homosexual marriages–a proposition likely to be even less successful than the country’s earlier campaign to prohibit the consumption of alcoholic beverages.  Wasn't that also strongly supported by the GOP?

I have what might be a better suggestion:   Why not push through an amendment outlawing heterosexual marriages? So you’ll know where I’m coming from, I’ve been married only once and to the same woman since 1959. One must concede, however, that heterosexual marriage hasn’t been an especially sacred institution. Better than 50% of all marriages end in divorce; a high percentage of those that endure are miserable failures, and spouse and child abuse are rampant in this society.

If you don’t like this idea why not just leave the Constitution alone? Let everyone, regardless of gender, be officially united, so everyone concerned can have their try at making the institution more successful than it has been in years gone by--long before the issue of “same-sex” marriages ever became a public issue.

Sincerely,

Gene Clanton

 

Letter to the Lewiston Tribune, 17 March 2004.

Dear Editor:

Back in 1948 President Truman was advised by enthusiastic supporters to "Give 'em hell, Harry!"  In this 2004 race shouldn't we substitute Kerry for Harry?

Truman always reminded his followers that he just told the truth about his Republican opponents and "they think it's hell."

Right on.  Give 'em hell, Kerry!

Sincerely,

Gene Clanton

"Only a True Believer could send a Christian Army of 150,000 into the midst of tens of millions of Muslims expecting to change their politics, their economy, their culture and the way of life.  And all this by June 30.  Throughout the centuries it has been tried many times; the Peasants' Crusade, the Hermits' Crusade, the Children's Crusade.  They all failed.  History, I believe, will refer to this one as the Idiot's Crusade." C. Bragg, The Nation, June 21, 2004.

Webmaster observation:  Back in the early 1990s, by which time the Reagan-Bush administrations had managed to triple the national debt by increasing it from about 1 trillion to 3 trillion dollars in about 12 years (it had required the previous 200 years for the debt to reach the trillion dollar level) I remarked to a colleague that we ought to have more concern for our posterity.  His response, offered only partly in jest, was, "What has posterity ever done for me?"  Unfortunately, that attitude seems to have become the the most salient principle of a great many Americans, especially that reactionary element of conservatism most often identified as neo-conservatism these days

 For the mind-boggling, escalating cost of Bush's unnecessary war go to this site: http://www.costofwar.com

 Dear Editor:
 
I truly appreciate your magazine and look forward to receiving it.  You've been running excellent pieces.  Keep up the good work!
 
I write, however, mainly to make a point regarding the Kerry campaign.   Over and over again the Bushies have exploited the allegation that the Senator refused to fund the war in Iraq after having voted in favor of it.  Where's the appropriate response?  As I understand it, Kerry's vote was a protest in favor of funding the war by dipping into Bush's fat-cat tax cuts.
 
Bush and Cheney have not funded the war!  They've merely passed the bill along to our children and grandchildren by means of record deficits.  Presidents Roosevelt and Truman borrowed to finance their wars but they also financed them in part by enacting those high tax rates the Bush crowd hate some much.  Where's the leadership?
 
Isn't it also about time we begin asking:  Who wants to be the last person to die in Bush's unnecessary war to depose Saddam?
 
Sincerely,
 
Gene Clanton
08/11/04

 

Dear Editor (Moscow Daily News, 10/29/04)

Apparently George W. Bush "went AWOL during the Vietnam War, lied about it to get elected, deceived us about Saddam being an imminent threat and sent our kids into Iraq wearing obsolete body armor tht couldn't stop AK47 rounds. President Bush deserves another term--25 years in Leavenworth!"

Amen to that!  You'll find the quote on one of the more interesting web sites to appear recently.  Try it you'll like it:  http://www.phonyfighterpilot.com

Let's just send Dubya back to Crawford, Texas, that is if the locals will let him return.  I understand he couldn't get an endorsement from his hometown paper.

Know what I mean Vern?  or was it Varnel?

Sincerely, Gene Clanton

 

 

     

 

SOME GOOD ADVICE for liberals from George McGovern:  When reactionary conservatives work at making the word "liberal" a pejorative term,  ask them to name the liberal programs they desire to repeal and/or undo. (Advice offered in an interview at the DNC on 28 July 2004.)

 

Timely bumper sticker:  "Politicians & diapers need to be changed, and for the same reason!"

========================================================================================

"The Speech Bush Should have Given," by Juan Cole, see www.juancole.com

This is the speech that I wish President Bush had given in fall, 2002, as he was trying to convince Congress to give him the authority to go to war against Iraq.


My fellow Americans:

I want us to go to war against Iraq. But I want us to have our eyes open and be completely realistic.

A war against Iraq will be expensive. It will cost you, the taxpayer, about $300 billion over five years.* I know Wolfowitz is telling you Iraq's oil revenues will pay for it all, but that's ridiculous. Iraq only pumps about $10 billion a year worth of oil, and it's going to need that just to run the new government we're putting in. No, we're going to have to pay for it, ourselves. I'm going to ask you for $25 billion, then $80 billion, then another $80 billion. And so on. I'm going to be back to you for money more often than that unemployed relative that you don't like. The cost of the war is going to drive up my already massive budget deficits from about $370 billion to more like $450 billion a year. Just so you understand, I'm going to cut taxes on rich people at the same time that I fight this war. Then I'm going to borrow the money to fight it, and to pay for much of what the government does. And you and your children will be paying off that debt for decades. In the meantime, your dollar isn't going to go as far when you buy something made overseas, since running those kinds of deficits will weaken our currency. (And I've set things up so that most things you buy will be made overseas.) We'll have to keep interest rates higher than they would otherwise have been and keep the economy in the doldrums, because otherwise my war deficits would cause massive inflation.

So I'm going to put you, your children, and your grandchildren deeply in hock to fight this war. I'm going to make it so there won't be a lot of new jobs created, and I'm going to use the excuse of the Federal red ink to cut way back on government services that you depend on. For the super-rich, or as I call them, "my base," this Iraq war thing is truly inspired. We use it to put up the deficit to the point where the Democrats and the more bleeding heart Republicans in Congress can't dare create any new programs to help the middle classes. We all know that the super-rich--about 3 million people in our country of 295 million-- would have to pay for those programs, since they own 45 percent of the privately held wealth. I'm damn sure going to make sure they aren't inconvenienced that way for a good long time to come.

Then, this Iraq War that I want you to authorize as part of the War on Terror is going to be costly in American lives. By the time of my second inaugural, over 1,300 brave women and men of the US armed forces will be dead as a result of this Iraq war, and 10,371 will have been maimed and wounded, many of them for life. America's streets and homeless shelters will likely be flooded, down the line, with some of these wounded vets. They will have problems finding work, with one or two limbs gone and often significant psychological damage. They will have even more trouble keeping any jobs they find. They will be mentally traumatized the rest of their lives by the horror they are going to see, and sometimes commit, in Iraq. But, well we've got a saying in Texas. I think you've got in over in Arkansas, too. You can't make an omelette without . . . you gotta break some eggs to wrassle up some breakfast.

I know Dick Cheney and Condi Rice have gone around scaring your kids with wild talk of Iraqi nukes. I have to confess to you that my CIA director, George Tenet, tells me that the evidence for that kind of thing just doesn't exist. In fact, I have to be frank and say that the Intelligence and Research Division of the State Department doesn't think Saddam has much of anything left even from his chemical weapons program. Maybe he destroyed the stuff and doesn't want to admit it because he's afraid the Shiites and Kurds will rise up against him without it. Anyway, Iraq just doesn't pose any immediate threat to the United States and probably doesn't have anything useful left of their weapons programs of the 1980s.

There also isn't any operational link between a secular Arab nationalist like Saddam and the religious loonies of al-Qaeda. They're scared of one another and hate each other more than each hates us. In fact, I have to be perfectly honest and admit that if we overthrow Saddam's secular Arab nationalist government, Iraq's Sunni Arabs will be disillusioned and full of despair. They are likely to turn to al-Qaeda as an alternative. So, folks, what I'm about to do could deliver 5 million Iraqis into the hands of people who are insisting they join some al-Qaeda offshoot immediately. Or else.

So why do I want to go to war? Look, folks, I'm just not going to tell you. I don't have to tell you. There is little transparency about these things in the executive, because we're running a kind of rump empire out of the president's office. After 20 or 30 years it will all leak out. Until then, you'll just have to trust me.

 

*Unfortunately the money has been borrowed & it will ultimately cost the taxpayers at least 3 X 300 billion, or close to 1 trillion dollars. (added by webmaster)


 

 

 

 

 







 

 

 

 

 

 

Last updated on: 1/30/2009 12:10:53 PM

Hit Counter  Hits


Want to get in touch? You can send me e-mail at:

O.G.Clanton@Clantons.net